Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials.
- David A. Jolliffe
- C. Camargo
- J. Sluyter
- M. Aglipay
- J. Aloia
- D. Ganmaa
- P. Bergman
- H. Bischoff-Ferrari
- A. Borzutzky
- C. T. Damsgaard
- G. Dubnov-Raz
- S. Esposito
- C. Gilham
- A. Ginde
- Inbal Golan-Tripto
- E. Goodall
- C. Grant
- C. Griffiths
- A. Hibbs
- W. Janssens
- A. Khadilkar
- I. Laaksi
- Margaret T. Lee
- M. Loeb
- J. Maguire
- P. Majak
- D. Mauger
- S. Manaseki-Holland
- D. Murdoch
- Akio Nakashima
- R. Neale
- H. Pham
- Christine Rake
- J. Rees
- Jenni Rosendahl
- R. Scragg
- D. Shah
- Yoshiki Shimizu
- S. Simpson-Yap
- Geeta Trilok‐Kumar
- M. Urashima
- A. Martineau
Citations: 164
Influential: 5
Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses
91
What this study found
Vitamin D supplementation modestly reduced the risk of having one or more acute respiratory infections compared with control. For the primary outcome, 14 332/23 364 participants (61.3%) in the vitamin D groups versus 14 217/22 802 (62.3%) in control had at least one ARI, with OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.99; 37 studies; I2=35.6%). Benefit was most evident with daily dosing, especially 400-1000 IU/day, and in participants aged 1.0-15.99 years; protection was not consistent across baseline 25(OH)D strata. Serious adverse events were not increased, and other secondary respiratory and safety outcomes…
- Study & population
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 randomized controlled trials including 75 541 participants from 23 countries.
- Intervention
- Vitamin D supplementation was evaluated in a range of regimens, including daily, weekly, monthly, and combined bolus-plus-daily dosing.
- Key limitation
- There was substantial between-trial heterogeneity, and the authors noted possible publication bias.
Original abstract
No abstract is available for this paper.