Vitamin D supplementation and incident preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Citations:145
Influential Citations:1
Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses
87
Enhanced Details
Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in pregnant women not previously treated with vitamin D before gestation. Across 59 active intervention arms, 4,777 participants were included overall, with trials conducted in multiple countries and enrolling women at varying gestational ages and preeclampsia risk levels.
Intervention
Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy was evaluated in multiple randomized trials using a wide range of regimens, including vitamin D3 and vitamin D2, given orally as daily doses, weekly doses, every-2-week dosing, or single/loading doses for durations ranging from a few weeks to the remainder of pregnancy. Several regimens also included calcium co-supplementation, but the review concluded that calcium did not add benefit beyond vitamin D.
Results
Vitamin D supplementation was associated with a lower risk of incident preeclampsia. The pooled effect was OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.52, with no between-study heterogeneity reported for this estimate (I2 = 0%). Benefit was stronger when supplementation started up to 20 weeks of gestation, with OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.50. Higher vitamin D doses were linked to greater risk reduction, while co-administration with calcium did not provide additional benefit.
Limitations
Interpretation is limited by substantial variation across trials in vitamin D form, dose, timing, and use of calcium co-supplementation. Many studies were small, and the supplied extract does not provide arm-specific baseline data, adverse-event detail, or individual trial outcome estimates. Generalizability is also limited by mixed populations, gestational ages, and risk profiles across countries and decades of study conduct.
Abstract
No abstract available