Skip to content

Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

BMJ Open
Q1
Nov 2019
Citations: 10
Influential: 0
Interventional (Human) Studies
93

What this study found

The intervention package was feasible, with high retention and generally acceptable adherence. Lycopene adherence was 78.6% (22 of 28), plant-based diet adherence was 40.0% for fruit and vegetables (10 of 25) and 72.0% for dairy replacement (18 of 25), and brisk walking adherence was 53.8% (21 of 39). The plant-based arm increased fruit and vegetable intake to 9.9 (SD 4.7) portions/day versus 6.2 (SD 3.8) in control, p=0.007; lycopene did not show a clear intake effect, p=0.12. There was no evidence of interaction between the nutrition and physical activity components (F=0.65, p=0.63), and…

Study & population
Phase II randomized feasibility trial using a 2×3 factorial design in men with localized prostate cancer scheduled for or recovering from radical prostatectomy.
Intervention
The nutrition intervention tested one 10 mg lycopene capsule daily by mouth for 6 months.
Key limitation
This was a small phase II feasibility study in a single-center postoperative prostate cancer population, so it was not powered for clinical efficacy outcomes.
View sourceOpen PDF

Original abstract

Objective Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. Design Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical prostatectomy, they were offered randomisation into a 2×3 factorial randomised controlled trial (RCT). Setting A single National Health Service trust in the South West of England, UK. Participants Those with localised prostate cancer and listed for radical prostatectomy were invited to participate. Randomisation Random allocation was performed by the Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration via an online system. Interventions Men were randomised into both a modified nutrition group (either increased vegetable and fruit, and reduced dairy milk; or lycopene supplementation; or control) and a physical activity group (brisk walking or control) for 6 months. Blinding Only the trial statistician was blind to allocations. Primary outcome measures Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility: randomisation rates and intervention adherence at 6 months. Collected at trial baseline, three and six months, with daily adherence reported throughout. Our intended adherence rate was 75% or above, the threshold for acceptable adherence was 90%. Results 108 men entered the presurgical cohort, and 81 were randomised into the postsurgical RCT (randomisation rate: 93.1%) and 75 completed the trial. Of 25 men in the nutrition intervention, 10 (40.0%; 95% CI 23.4% to 59.3%) adhered to the fruit and vegetable recommendations and 18 (72.0%; 95% CI 52.4% to 85.7%) to reduced dairy intake. Adherence to lycopene (n=28), was 78.6% (95% CI 60.5% to 89.8%), while 21/39 adhered to the walking intervention (53.8%; 95% CI 38.6% to 68.4%). Most men were followed up at 6 months (75/81; 92.6%). Three ‘possibly related’ adverse events were indigestion, abdominal bloating and knee pain. Conclusions Interventions were deemed feasible, with high randomisation rates and generally good adherence. A definitive RCT is proposed. Trial registration number ISRCTN 99048944.