Skip to content

Research paper

Methyltetrahydrofolate vs Folic Acid Supplementation in Idiopathic Recurrent Miscarriage with Respect to Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase C677T and A1298C Polymorphisms: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PLoS ONE
Q1
Dec 2015
Citations: 34
Influential: 3
Interventional (Human) Studies
84

Study answer

What this study found

5-MTHF improved serum folate more than folic acid, but it did not improve clinical pregnancy outcomes. Ongoing pregnancy at 20 weeks was 27 of 66 in the folic acid group versus 36 of 69 in the 5-MTHF group, and the difference was not significant. Plasma homocysteine decreased in both groups over time, but the between-group difference was not significant (value = 0.01, p = 0.147). The authors concluded that, aside from higher serum folate levels, 5-MTHF did not provide additional benefit over folic acid for recurrent abortion across MTHFR polymorphisms.

Study & population
Randomized controlled trial in women aged 20 to 45 years with three or more idiopathic recurrent abortions recruited from recurrent abortion clinics in Tehran, Iran.
Intervention
Women received either folic acid 1 mg daily or 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) 1 mg daily.
Key limitation
Clinical interpretation is limited by a modest sample size and reduced analyzable numbers for the pregnancy endpoint (66 and 69).
View sourceOpen PDF

Original abstract

Purpose To determine whether 5-methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHF) is more effective than folic acid supplementation in treatment of recurrent abortion in different MTHFR gene C677T and A1298C polymorphisms. Methods A randomized, double blind, placebo-c…