Methyltetrahydrofolate vs Folic Acid Supplementation in Idiopathic Recurrent Miscarriage with Respect to Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase C677T and A1298C Polymorphisms: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PLoS ONE
Q1
Dec 2015
Citations:34
Influential Citations:3
Interventional (Human) Studies
84
S2 IconPDF Icon

Enhanced Details

Methods
Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial conducted in Tehran, Iran; 220 women aged 20–45 with three or more idiopathic recurrent abortions participated; stratified blocked randomization by age and number of previous abortions.
Intervention
Daily 1 mg 5-MTHF or 1 mg folic acid, starting at least 8 weeks before conception and continuing to 20 weeks of gestation.
Results
Primary outcome: ongoing pregnancy at 20 weeks was not significantly different (36/69 with 5-MTHF vs 27/66 with folic acid). Serum folate rose more with 5-MTHF (p<0.01); plasma homocysteine decreased in both groups with no between-group difference (p=0.147). No safety concerns; compliance high. Conclusion: 5-MTHF did not improve pregnancy outcomes compared with folic acid across studied MTHFR C677T/A1298C polymorphisms, though it raised serum folate levels.
Limitations
Did not measure folate receptor autoantibodies; potential selection bias and concurrent therapies; optimistic sample size estimation and relatively high loss to follow-up.

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether 5-methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHF) is more effective than folic acid supplementation in treatment of recurrent abortion in different MTHFR gene C677T and A1298C polymorphisms. Methods A randomized, double blind, placebo-c...