Skip to content

Research paper

Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open
Q1
Jan 2012
Citations: 197
Influential: 7
Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses
93

Study answer

What this study found

Overall, folic acid supplementation showed a borderline increase in cancer incidence in randomized trials and no clear reduction in cancer risk. Total cancer incidence was RR 1.07 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.14) across 10 RCTs, and prostate cancer incidence was significantly higher at RR 1.24 (1.03 to 1.49) across 6 RCTs. Cancer mortality was not significantly increased overall: RR 1.09 (0.92 to 1.30) across 6 RCTs. Observational studies did not show an overall difference in cancer incidence, but subgroup sensitivity analyses suggested higher mortality in studies with >30% smokers, higher folic acid…

Study & population
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and controlled observational studies in adults taking folic acid supplements.
Intervention
Oral folic acid supplementation, generally as tablets, at doses of at least 0.4 mg/day across the included trials.
Key limitation
Evidence came largely from highly selected trial populations, limiting generalizability to broader groups such as women of childbearing age.
View sourceOpen PDF

Original abstract

Objective To explore if there is an increased cancer risk associated with folic acid supplements given orally. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies of folic acid supplementation in humans reporting cancer incidence and/or …