Skip to content

A randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidants in critically ill patients.

The New England journal of medicine
Q1
Apr 2013
Citations: 774
Influential: 22
Interventional (Human) Studies
100

What this study found

Early supplementation did not improve outcomes overall, and glutamine was associated with worse survival. For 28-day mortality, glutamine increased death versus no glutamine (32.4% vs 27.2%; adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.64; P = 0.05), while antioxidants had no significant effect (30.8% vs 28.8%; adjusted odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.40; P = 0.48). In-hospital mortality and 6-month mortality were also significantly higher among patients who received glutamine. Serious adverse events occurred in 52 cases among 46 patients, with 4 considered potentially related to study…

Study & population
Randomized, multicenter, factorial trial in critically ill adults with multiorgan failure requiring mechanical ventilation.
Intervention
This 2x2 factorial trial tested early nutritional supplementation with glutamine, antioxidants, or both, compared with matched placebo.
Key limitation
Complex factorial design with multiple active regimens makes isolated attribution less straightforward, and the excerpt provides limited arm-specific detail for secondary outcomes.
View sourceOpen PDF

Original abstract

BACKGROUND Critically ill patients have considerable oxidative stress. Glutamine and antioxidant supplementation may offer therapeutic benefit, although current data are conflicting. METHODS In this blinded 2-by-2 factorial trial, we randomly assigned 1223 critically ill adults in 40 intensive care units (ICUs) in Canada, the United States, and Europe who had multiorgan failure and were receiving mechanical ventilation to receive supplements of glutamine, antioxidants, both, or placebo. Supplements were started within 24 hours after admission to the ICU and were provided both intravenously and enterally. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Because of the interim-analysis plan, a P value of less than 0.044 at the final analysis was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS There was a trend toward increased mortality at 28 days among patients who received glutamine as compared with those who did not receive glutamine (32.4% vs. 27.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.64; P=0.05). In-hospital mortality and mortality at 6 months were significantly higher among those who received glutamine than among those who did not. Glutamine had no effect on rates of organ failure or infectious complications. Antioxidants had no effect on 28-day mortality (30.8%, vs. 28.8% with no antioxidants; adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.40; P=0.48) or any other secondary end point. There were no differences among the groups with respect to serious adverse events (P=0.83). CONCLUSIONS Early provision of glutamine or antioxidants did not improve clinical outcomes, and glutamine was associated with an increase in mortality among critically ill patients with multiorgan failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00133978.).