A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of vitamin D3 and calcium in multiple sclerosis

Neurology
Q1
Jun 2010
Citations:349
Influential Citations:22
Interventional (Human) Studies
80
S2 IconPDF Icon

Enhanced Details

Methods
Open-label randomized prospective controlled 52-week trial in adults with multiple sclerosis; 49 participants (25 treatment, 24 control); mean age 40.5 years; 40 women and 9 men; 45 relapsing-remitting MS and 4 secondary progressive MS; disease-modifying therapy allowed; randomization by blinded drawing; groups matched for age, disease duration, EDSS, and disease-modifying drug use.
Intervention
Vitamin D3 with calcium: vitamin D3 dose escalated to 40,000 IU/day over 28 weeks, then 10,000 IU/day for 12 weeks, followed by down-titration to 0; calcium 1,200 mg/day throughout; vitamin D3 taken orally as hyperconcentrated solutions with dose adjustments (1–4 mL/week) to achieve target dose; calcium provided as powder (tricalcium phosphate) to deliver 1,200 mg/day.
Results
High-dose vitamin D3 with calcium for 52 weeks is safe in MS: serum calcium remained within the reference range with no significant adverse events; peak 25(OH)D reached about 413 nmol/L; urinary calcium/creatinine rose at the highest doses but stayed below 1.0; PTH stayed in normal range; no renal or hepatic dysfunction observed. Immunologic measures showed reduced T-cell proliferative responses in the vitamin D group (TCS decreased; p=0.002); greater reductions in TCS seen in those with 25(OH)D ≥100 nmol/L at 52 weeks (p=0.032). Clinically, relapse rate declined in the treatment group (ARR 0.26) vs control (ARR 0.45) but not statistically significant (p=0.09); EDSS changes were small. Overall, the regimen appears safe and immunomodulatory, but clinical outcomes were underpowered; evidence for safety is Class II, for clinical outcomes Class IV; a multicenter, blinded Phase II trial is planned to better define MRI and clinical benefits.
Limitations
Open-label design; small sample size (n=49); not powered for clinical outcomes; matching design limited enrollment; potential biases due to nonblinding and differential monitoring; control group allowed some vitamin D intake; results require replication in larger, blinded trials.

Abstract

Objective: Low vitamin D status has been associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence and risk, but the therapeutic potential of vitamin D in established MS has not been explored. Our aim was to assess the tolerability of high-dose oral vitamin...